{"id":763,"date":"2023-02-22T02:43:57","date_gmt":"2023-02-22T02:43:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.justsheetmusic.com\/blog\/?p=763"},"modified":"2023-02-22T02:43:57","modified_gmt":"2023-02-22T02:43:57","slug":"a-brief-performance-history-of-bachs-goldberg-variations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.justsheetmusic.com\/blog\/composers\/a-brief-performance-history-of-bachs-goldberg-variations\/","title":{"rendered":"A Brief Performance History of Bach’s Goldberg Variations"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

Simone Dinnerstein - JS Bach Goldberg Variations<\/p><\/div>\n

The standard account of Johann Sebastian Bach’s<\/a> composition of his famous ‘Goldberg Variations’ comes from a biography of Bach, by Johann Nikolaus Forkel, which first appeared in 1802. Forkel says that Bach wrote these works as an insomnia cure for a patron, Count Keyserlingk. Specifically, he wrote them for the performances of a former student of his, Johann Gottlieb Goldberg, in the Count\u2019s employment.<\/p>\n

They seem to have worked! Goldberg would play them in the evening, the Count would drift off happily to sleep, and \u2013 in recognition of this success \u2013 the Count gave Bach a golden goblet filled with 100 gold coins.<\/p>\n

Anna Harwell Celenza<\/a> has even made a children\u2019s book out of this touching incident.<\/p>\n

Some historians have sought to throw cold water over this story. They note, for example that the music isn\u2019t even remotely lullaby-like, and that the title page of the work, which Bach called simply \u201cAria with Divers Variations,\u201d contains no dedication. If Bach had written it with a specific patron in mind, the custom of the time would have suggested some flowery dedicatory words about the munificence of the Count.<\/p>\n

Anyway, it is a lovely story, and the simple fact is that the works we know by Goldberg\u2019s name were first published in 1741, though they only slowly attained the status as Classics that they possess now.<\/p>\n

Bach Outside of Church<\/h3>\n

For a quick take on this historical context, consider what Mehmet Okonsar, a Turkish-Belgian pianist, is trying to tell us here. He explains why the Variations constituted a \u201crevolutionary instrumental accomplishment,\u201d and why we should resist the temptation to see all of Bach through the lens of his church-commissioned works: we shouldn\u2019t work to find a religious sensibility in his \u201cprofane and purely instrumental works.\u201d Relax, and let yourself be entertained.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Franz Liszt<\/p><\/div>\n

The Goldberg variations were not often played in the early decades of the 19th<\/sup> century, though. They may have seemed old-fashioned to the musicians of the time, whereas other aspects of Bach\u2019s oeuvre had more continuing appeal to the romantics.<\/p>\n

There were exceptions to the general rule of neglect. Notably, in 1838-48, Franz Liszt<\/a> went on tour, and among the music he played were his favorites of Bach, the Goldberg variations among them. These tours may have kept up interest in them.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Glenn Gould<\/h3>\n

But let us skip forward a bit from there and get to the moment when, in 1955, the Canadian classical pianist Glenn Gould<\/a> made the Goldberg Variations the content of his debut album. One intriguing coincidence here \u2013 Gould, like Count Keyserlingk before him, suffered from insomnia.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Glenn Gould<\/p><\/div>\n

Gould revisited this material in 1981, (by which time his 1955 album had sold 100,000 copies), when he recorded a new version. The two recordings show the width of interpretive freedom the material Variations<\/em>allow.<\/p>\n

Gould was unhappy with the tempo he had kept through the first album, and in the second he slows things down considerably. The 1955 album is just 33 minutes and 34 seconds long. The 1981 album is 51 minutes, 18 seconds. (Still, there are some who like it slower than that. Another Canadian classicist, Angela Hewitt,<\/a> in 1999 recorded it at 78 minutes, 32 seconds.)<\/p>\n

Gould was especially unhappy with his original take on the 25th<\/sup> variation. He said he had made it sound \u201clike a Chopin nocturne\u201d \u2013 which perhaps doesn\u2019t sound like a devastating critique to you or me, but obviously did to Gould! Gould had a long list of distinguished composers of whom he had a low opinion \u2013 Chopin<\/a> was on it.<\/p>\n

At least one critic, Colin Fleming, <\/a>has noted that Gould\u2019s 1981 take on that 25th<\/sup> variation accomplished the goal of taking the Chopin out of the piece. But the result doesn\u2019t really sound like a Bach variation either. Gould\u2019s second version of that variation ends up, Fleming says, as \u201csomething purely autonomous, amorphous and still distinct, conjuring a feeling of impenetrable isolation.\u201d<\/p>\n

Gustav Leonhardt, a Dutch harpsichordist, has recorded the Goldberg Variations three times in the course of his illustrious career. The first of his recordings precedes the first of Gould\u2019s. The latest was a 2004 CD brought out by DHM.<\/p>\n

Since Gould<\/h3>\n

Leonhardt stands out in the recent history of Goldberg Variations performers because he is also a scholar of the history of instrumentation. I was amused to see that an interviewer had asked him about the three sorts of keyboard that were in common domestic use in Bach\u2019s day: the harpsichord the clavichord, and the portative organ. What, the interviewer asked, was the relationship between them?<\/p>\n

Leonhardt gave a down-to-earth answer, \u201cI think they were largely overlapping, and the composers couldn\u2019t care less. Someone at home would use indifferently whichever was practical\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

In 1979, computer scientist Douglas Hofstadter<\/a> sought to popularize then-new ideas about artificial intelligence in a book called G\u00f6del, Escher, Bach<\/strong>. G\u00f6del was part of this \u201ceternal golden braid\u201d because his mathematical discoveries were historically critical to the development of ideas about AI. Escher\u2019s prints seem to give visual form to the weird loopiness that is necessary for the production of anything akin to consciousness. Bach joined the braid because \u2026 well, in large part because of the Goldberg Variations.<\/p>\n

Hofstadter was fascinated by the way in which the final \u2018Variation\u2019 breaks the rules that Bach had imposed upon himself for all those that had preceded it. The last one \u201ccontains extraneous musical ideas having little to do with the original Theme \u2013 in fact, two German folk tunes<\/a>.\u201d This feeds back into the philosophical contemplation of artificial intelligence, for it gives the work as a whole the appearance of something that can step outside of itself, of self-transcendence we associate with creativity itself<\/em>, not its productions.<\/p>\n

In 2007, Simone Dinnerstein<\/a> (pictured above) released her own recording of the Goldberg Variations. A writer in the on-line magazine Slate<\/em> hailed this as the best thing since Gould. The writer, Evan Eisenberg, said that Dinnerstein\u2019s performance of Variation 13 in particular was pensive, wistful, and possessed \u201can ebb and flow as natural as breathing.\u201d<\/p>\n

Courtesy of YouTube,<\/a> you can listen to how Dinnerstein performed the basic air whence it all sprang, then listen to how Gould (in his 1981 incarnation), did likewise.<\/p>\n

<\/object><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The standard account of Johann Sebastian Bach’s composition of his famous ‘Goldberg Variations’ comes from a biography of Bach, by Johann Nikolaus Forkel, which first appeared in 1802. Forkel says that Bach wrote these works as an insomnia cure for a patron, Count Keyserlingk. Specifically, he wrote them for the performances of a former student […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[12,80,19],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n